12:38 PM (5 hours ago)

If nuetrons can explode you would expect there would be evidence.

Buddy Doyle	5:06 PM (1 hour ago)
to me

On 2/2/2012 5:38 PM, STEVE A wrote:

If nuetrons can explode you would expect there would be evidence.

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:01 PM, STEVE A <aircloudenator@gmail.com> wrote:

1987.

Anyway it may not be a good theory for the missing star but it may be that nuetrons do explode in the big crunch the missing nuetron star suggested that to me.

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Buddy Doyle <buddy@amarillogold.com> wrote:

1987?

On 2/2/2012 5:08 AM, STEVE A wrote:

Sorry the supa nova was in 1984.

                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ SN_1987A> appears

                       to be a core-collapse supernova

                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Type_II_supernova>,

                       which should result in a neutron star

                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Neutron_star> given

                       the size of the original star.^[6]
                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ SN_1987A#cite_note-Arnett-5>

                        Indeed, the neutrino data indicate that a
                       compact object

                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Compact_star> did

                       form at the star's core. However, since
                       the supernova first became visible,
                       astronomers have been searching for the
                       collapsed core but have not detected it.
                       The Hubble Space Telescope

                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Hubble_Space_Telescope> has

                       taken images of the supernova regularly
                       since August 1990, but, so far, the images
                       have shown no evidence of a neutron star.
                       A number of possibilities for the
                       'missing' neutron star are being
                       considered, although none is clearly
                       favored. The first is that the neutron
                       star is enshrouded in dense dust clouds so
                       that it cannot be seen. Another is that a
                       pulsar

                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Pulsar> was

                       formed, but with either an unusually large
                       or small magnetic field. It is also
                       possible that large amounts of material
                       fell back on the neutron star, so that it
                       further collapsed into a black hole

                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Black_hole>.

                       Neutron stars and black holes often give
                       off light when material falls onto them.
                       If there is a compact object in the
                       supernova remnant, but no material to fall
                       onto it, it could be very dim and
                       therefore could avoid detection. Other
                       scenarios have also been considered, such
                       as if the collapsed core became a quark
                       star

                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Quark_star>.^[10]
                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ SN_1987A#cite_note-9>
                       ^[11]
                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ SN_1987A#cite_note-10>


                       Did the nuetron star

                       <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Neutron_star> explode

                       in the supa nova in a stage 2............?
                       So could nuetrons in a big crunch
                       signularity explode to give the big
                       bang................
                       The nuetrons being the product of electron
                       proton annihilation.

                       My theory buddy is that neutrons when they
                       are in the same place in the same
                       supermassive state at the same time form a
                       type of singularity which explodes by some
                       unknown mechanism in the big bang............
                       My idea that is that electron proton
                       annihilation produces energy plus neutrons
                       and stage 2 is where the nuetrons explode
                       to give a quark gluon plasma enormous heat
                       and gravity is involved.

If nuetrons explode why are there Nuetron stars, what made them not explode?