SCEPTICAL LOOK AT MY THEORY-JUSTIN LEIGHTON

Thermodynamics would not reverse in a crunch imo. Time will still be
going forward, simply decreasing volume with the same energy, thus
entropy would decrease to zero at the start point, while temperatures
ironically rise. At the moment the singularity exists, temperature
(defined as the motion of particles) would be zero and therefore
entropy (total degrees of motion) of the system will reduce to zero.

In expansion phases, entropy will continue to increase as average
temperature falls, total energy remaining unchanged. (more complex
systems have greater entropy)

Since the temperature is falling, and the acceleration will be proven
to be powered by galactic evolution, the expansion will turn from
speeding to slowing, just as slope does that half way up a sin wave.
That is because the "dark energy" (virtual particles) will begin to
decrease in density,  the virtual particle density being lowest toward
the center. That will be the apex of the sin wave, and the point of
maximum entropy (most complex energy forms).

As the dark energy becomes depleted from central regions. the inward
acceleration will begin due to the dark matter and energy (virtual
paticles). With the overall size of the universe decreasing,  the
total energy and temperature climb toward infinity, while entropy
falls. Again the system crosses the crunch point and exists with no
informational states. This ocurs because in a singularity, no
information can by definition exist. Two particles must be compared to
derive what we call data or information.


What causes the particles to arise is beyond me. I have a hunch that a
superluminal particle condenses the instant after the big bang. If the
particle is able orbit another particle, it could give rise to quarks,
photons etc. The establishment tends to claim that dark energy and
matter accounted for much of the early universe along with photons.
Matter seems to srt of evolve from the dark matter and energy.

ONE TO ONE

One-to-One Correspondence 

in mathematics, the correspondence between elements of two sets such that each element of the first set corresponds to a specific element of the second set and each element of the second set corresponds to a specific element of the first set. A one-to-one correspondence is a particular form of a function or mapping, in which the given function and its inverse are single-valued. If a one-to-one correspondence can be established between two sets, then these sets are equivalent. For example, the sets of integers and their squares are equivalent since the correspondence n → n² is a one-to-one correspondence.

2 YEN= 2 DOLLARS= 1 RUPEE.......... then 2=4 is true for the QM and Gr equations in tandem

#}##pDRAFT#######E###########################################################################################################}##ONE AUTHOR AGAINST EINSTEIN IS ENOUGH WHEN HE IS WRONG ABOUT �
####´#ð#e#´#ð######VIRTUAL PARTICLES.
.####################################################

Einsetin said that only one author was necessary is he was wrong �
about anything in his thoery.
And that is arrogance because even Einstein is only a man and he �
makes mistakes.
.lm  
And he has made one hell of a mistake.Because virtual particles �
in Einsteins thoery have infinite graviational mass because they �
have infinite energy and energy and mass are the same thing.But �
the  the measurement of virtual particles which is not proven �
100% 100% shows that they have zero gravitaional energy so we �
have to renormalise QM and that means Fenyman diagrams for GR.And �
we can't renormalise fenyman diagrams and if we could renormalise  �
Einsteins theory of relativity then we could make QM and GR agree �
on one thing that virtual particles have zero G.And then like �

Hawking used radiation to unify QM and GR we could make a start �
on a new theory of gravity.And nothing is further from the truth �
gravity is not QM it is GR and it cannotbe renormalised to �
zero.If it could approach zero Einstein would be wrong and so �
would QM so it would not do any good to say that G>0 <infinity �
then it is a very large number which means the universe will end �
in a big crunch.Because the total value for Expansions is the �
consological constant plus the gravitaional force of virtual �
particles and the the dark energy which must be greater than the �
dark matter and in fact dark matter must be> dark energy if the �
unv uuniverse will end in a big crunch.........But the universe �
is aaaccelerating and that means G is not great enough to slow �
the expansion so g for virtual particles must not be a very large �
number and it can be very large and still not slow the �
expansion.But if it infinite then it will stop the expansion �
totally rigth now and it does not..So maybe they are wrong that �
the universe is accelerating then G could be a very large value �
if there is a lot of dark matter and not so much dark energy and �
therethere is a lot of G from virtual particles

.And this does not �
prove Einstein wrong but means his theory needs a little tweaking �
like making it right for a Godel universe in 10 large spacial �
diemddimensions a godel can contract but cannot expand and it is �
just right for a big crunch because the orbits are circular and �
atoms cannot exist without the electrons spiralling into the �
nucleus and this is annihilation because the natural repulsion �
between electrons is overcome by strong gravity and the mass of �
the supereclectron is equal to the proton so when they are in the �
same space at the same time in the same state then they anni#�
hilate producing gamma rays and nuetrons which then form a new �
kind of singularity which results in a big bang.........Einstein �
cannot be expressed in ten large spacial dimensions only in 4D �
space time you cannot convert EInsteins equations to 10 D.And if �
not then you cannot prove string theory to be correct.Because �
string theory is in only six dimensions that are curled up and �
four that are large spacial no one except me has ever suggested �
that string theory could be in ten large spacial dimensions.But i �
think that they could have been open and as the universe con#�
tracted six of those dimensions curled up.And it doesn't make # 
ð
would not exist as it requires a dimension of time to exist that �
means there had to be three dimenions of space.......The universe �
requires it that is why it had to be that way............But this �
is paln B and does not prove EInstein wrong even if string thoery �
does not agree with his theory in ten dimesnions.Since it is an �
imag imaginary universe a Godel where time can be reversed.And �
everything is determined this kind of universe cannot predict the �
initial starting conditions of our universe and the equations for �
Einsteins theory that result from it.............

Einstein is a very smart man but even the most clever men make �
mistakes.And that is the arguement we shall use about virtsual �
particles.They do not really exist and that is a very positive �
thing because they are confusing and if we simplify and say there �
are no virtual particles then they have zero gravity.And that �
solves the problem the universe will go on forever.And will never �
stop expanding until it is a  total vacume and the idea that it �
will ever become another big bang is totally stupid the unverse �
will not forget it's size and become tiny again this is just a �
fudge to make it work when it doesn't.Maybe the universe will �
contract because dark matter> dark energy.And this is again a �
very positive point of view because there is more than enough �
energy in virtual particles to end the universe we don't need �
dark matter to explain contraction................And if it is �
there then why is the universe expanding faster and �
faster............It must be because dark energy> dark matter.And �
this is the kind of equation I used in the first book. Energy is �
greatet than matter and if dark energy is greater than dark �
matter when it comes to G the universe will expand �
forever........And that does not include virtual particles they �
can only make a good thing bad.Because they can cause the uni#�
verse to contract even if dark matter> dark energy.
And of course dark matter will be greater than virtual particles.

But if niether dark matter nor dark energy exist then virtual �
particles>0 and less than infinity they are very> a very large G �
number and that was my first hypothesis that Gravity is greater �
than the expansion............Even if our present unverse does �
not crunch it may have begun with a big crunch in a different �
kind of universe with different laws where a crunch can happen.
And if the intial conditions are all predetermined by the big �
crunch then the idea that we do not know what happened before is �
not true.And time may begin again a second time with the big �
bang.But we can still predict teh inital starting conditions.
And this is crazy to believe time can start again.But it can stop �
and the watch can start again from where it left off.That means �
we can know when time stopped and when it started again.


My string theory of everything is that black holes in another �
universe resulted in our universe.............And the other �
universe is one that contracts and it is a Godel and a Godel �
can't expand but can contract and rotate as well............A �
rotating black holein a godel universe is contradictory in time # 
ð
Hawkings reverse penrose equation we get a big bang in our uni#�
verse in four space/time dimensions.........But the Godel is in �
ten large spacial dimensions.And there is a reason six of those �
curled up when the universe contracted and formed a huge signu#�
larity which became our universe.But then we have two we do#�
n'thave one and we don't have a multiverse except backwards in �
the time dimension then there are infinite universes back in time �
which all may have different laws but not somewhere out there.If �
it makes sense to say out there where there is nothing there �
beyond our universe except in some other dimension.
And this thoery does make no sense execpet if you can get the �
equations for planet earth from 10^500 different rules that are �
random in other universes.
There could still be 10^500 different rules as we go back through �
the different universes from square one.
And there would be no square one.
But there must have been a begining even if there was a multive#�
rse back in time............Because 2+2=4.. And that is crazy how �
does that prove anything.
Put simply 2+2=4 does not balance for a bouncing ball energy is �
lost and does not balance with momentum which is Einsteins second �
equation.
E does not equal MC^2 for 2+2=4 big bounces..........and to make �
it work we need THE FUDGE the fudge is mass increases as the �
speed of light goes faster so energy balances with mass over �
2+2=4 bounces.
And this is totally rigthous.
Because the equation for the universe balances just like the �
cosmlogical constant.
Only mass must reach infinity with time going on �
forever...........
And maybe mass just appraoches infinity and time still goes on �
forever with mass reaching 99.99999 of the speed of light whatev#�
er that is back in time..............
If mass never reaches one then the problem is solved the universe �
can goon forever.
But if mass does have to reach infinity if time never ends then �
infinite mass is a dealbreaker for Einsetin.
And we can get rid of the infinities in Einsteins equations by �
tweaking it with virtual particles having large but not infinite �
energy.That is where the mistake is in EInsteins theory.
It has to be with infinity.
If we can make everything finite because of virtual particles �
then we have a quantum/Einsten thoery of gravity which is a �
little like a thoery of everythhing.
But we have three others forces which are already unified so to �
slove the problem is to unifiy everything.
And Iam not a mathematician and leave it to the maths profesors �
to work out whether my simplifiction makes sense mathematically.
But Einsteins did not notice the universe was expanding or that �
his equations allowed time travel.
And it is the same with virtual particles they are the answer to �
everything.
And if the universe can contract then it did in the past then we # 
ð
universe for the right set of Einsteins equations.The initial �
starying conditions for the universe can give you the set of �
Einsteins equations that will work for our universe.If the inti#�
tal starting conditions are wrong then our univers eis not predi#�
catble.And it is super the gravity and it is not that super that �
it can predict everything.And reversing the directionof time is �
not like unscambling an omelette and the order increases s it is �
eactly liek that so the order was created by evolution and that �
is how God did it.Because he is God he can do it anyway he wants �
to and he can't he has to obey the bible which was written by His �
holy spirit so it is not one book and it is totally one and seven �
as well.And maybe this thoery is 666 because it is what they �
beleive no instead of lamaires thoery.........And the catholic �
church still believes in the big bang.But no one else does be#�
cause they have listened to half a man the other half of captain �
kirk.And they are half men when they believe in the big crunch �
and they might be whole men who are halfhearted.Because if you �
believe in evolution the big crunch is right for you.If you �
believe it happened in another universe at a different time.And �
that just begs the question you have to have another universe �
where the big crunch works because it does not work in ours �
according to measurement and measurement is what science is all �
about.
We can propose a unified theory of everything based on  a uni#�
verse that may not exist and it will still work and it will be �
eovlutionary since the challenge is to make up a creation science �
theory of everything that can be taught alongside.And it cannot �
be done.Because there is no equation for God he is just a first  �
ccause in the big bang.But an exnihilo thoery of everything would �
make the word the source of all information and that is a begin#�
ing somebody else will finish the idea.And it doesn't matter and �
of course it does it matters not to loose the good we oft might �
win by fearing to attempt...........But I have made up a  thoery �
ofevolution because I was an evolutionist and now i know why my �
thoery is wrong because like Einstein I have proved my own thoery �
wrong with infinity..........You cannot have infinite �
mass.........or light cannot travel faster than C if it could �
then mass could be infinite.But it cannot ever be as large as �
infinity.So the only alternative is for mass to approach infinity �
and never quite equal then 2+2 does not equal four and that is �
proof that evolution is wrong.But you can ever understand that �
proof and you only need to look at a bouncing ball.If it will not �
work inour universe it may never work in any other.Because 2+2 �
will not equal four in any big crunch universe.And that is taking �
the glory back from satan he would say 2+2=4 is his thing but it �
really is a totally natural thing and it can subverted to be �
suprnature.And just because it is true doesn't mean that the �
devil can't use it.And just because it is not true that is this �
thoery doesn't mean that the devil can't use it.And that is what �
Marg said because she is a woman of God.Marg Weiland was inter#�
ested in the four laws but there is not time to discuss them �
here.
They are a great way to spread the gospel and thier is no subsi#�
tutute for the gospel and it is found in the book of romans we # 
ð
Ghost who we can recieve by faith.It begins and ends with �
faith.If it begins with works righeousness it will end with filty �
rags but if it begins with faith in the gospel it will end with �
faith in the gospel.
There must be a  universe where diracs 1938 electron proton �
annihilation equation works one rule out of 10^500 random rules.
You can add random equations with the dice for diracs equation �
and get a rule where it works in a 10 large spacial dimension �
universe with supergravity that overcomes the repulsion between �
electrons so that the mass of the proton equals the mass of the �
electron then they can annihilate.
It is this rule that is the key to the theory of everything.
This is a perfect theory that we can get the intial starting �
conditions and work out EInsteins equations for everything for �
our universe.But what if they don't work then it is back to the �
drawking board we can tweak the universe that preceeded ours to �
get the right equations but that is a cheat and that is far from �
elegant.But just like particle theory we can make it work by �
making it fit the obseverations and that is bad science you make �
the thoery fit the observations is good science but the thoery is �
meant to predict the observations not be modified to make it �
fit.And that is the whole idea of science we need to make the �
theory fit the onservations so we could argue forever.......But �
we can take what we can get and that is a great science thoery if �
we can'[t get a thoery of everything then we can get a thoery of �
ssomething or of nothing......or of something out of �
nothing...........And we may never understand how something came �
form nothing.But we need a bomb and we don't so maybe we should �
not ask for infinite energy maybe man can't handle that kind of �
power.And if he can then God knows how to make it safe for �
him...........Because if you ask God for a solution to the energy �
crisis then he does not give a scorpian he gives a loaf of bread.

Classical mechanics will work in a big crunch universe.But it is �
statement true or is it a lie.Heizenberg will work even in a big �
crunch universe where is no uncertainty and my arguement is that �
will not work where there certainty about the future.And since �
the future is the past reversed there are no questions that �
cannot be answered about a big crunch universe.But can we go from �
certainty to uncertainty if no is certainty then we cannot go �
from a no to a yes. And we can know the initial starting condi#�
tions which can give us the version of Einsteins equations that �
are right for the big bang in our universe.But what if the equa#�
tions ar enot right for our universe then it is Gods plan B.It �
can apply in 10^500 other universes but ours is special it was �
intelligently designed God intervened.And if he did intervene �
than no explaination without God will even satisfy the intial �
starting conditions.
Classical mechanics can explain why electrons spiral into atoms �
and why planets spiral into stars or off into space.
In ten dimensions large spacial dimensions classical mechanics �
works because there is no need for heizenberg in a contracting �
universe..........And this is so bright not one can deny it but �
they can say this universe is imaginary and even if the math is # 
ð
So we can create a classical theory of everything one that com#�
plements the standard model now that it is complete.What then �
when we have completed both models then we have to get both �
models to agree with string thoery and I have a handle on that �
too.
So that is the next step explain it all with �
strings...............In ten large spacial dimensions where we �
start with six extra open dimensions that curl up and leave four �
dimensions for the big bang....This is a perfect plan B for �
evolution but may not explain our universe and its fine tuning �
only ex-nihilo can explain how God is part of the process.And we �
can't leave him out of the equation or we get a babbler of a �
computer wih garbage being programmed in and garbage coming out