Did it have to bang.?
A 10 large spacial dimensions godel universe with circular orbits has a black hole and it is contradictory in time/space............the penrose equation for such a rotating black hole can be reversed and that gives us a non contradictory in time space Einstein type equation for the big bang in our universe.
It is just clever maths and it is Ockahams rasor the simplist mathematical explaination...........
But it is also positivist because this type of universe produces an equation for our universe that can be worked out.
samedi 28 avril 2012
vendredi 27 avril 2012
HOT MEXICAN BREAKFAST THEORY OF COSMIC EVOLUTION
The eggs are the nucleus the bacon is the electrons which spiral into the nucleus.
And the refried beans are diracs theory of electron proton annihilation.
And the hot means kinetic energy and gamma rays are released from the annihilation of protons and elctrons producing nuetrons and a singularty under really intense strong graviational force and it is hot from the energe of annihilation...........
This means it goes to the next logical step this unstable mass explodes.................
The intermediate steps are unkown at present so we cannot draw up an equation but we can try.
And the refried beans are diracs theory of electron proton annihilation.
And the hot means kinetic energy and gamma rays are released from the annihilation of protons and elctrons producing nuetrons and a singularty under really intense strong graviational force and it is hot from the energe of annihilation...........
This means it goes to the next logical step this unstable mass explodes.................
The intermediate steps are unkown at present so we cannot draw up an equation but we can try.
WHY I WRITE ABOUT EVOLUTION NOT CREATION EX_NIHILO
For the sinful nature desires what is contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit what is contrary to the sinful nature. They are in conflict with each other, so that you do not do what you want.
New Living Translation (©2007)
The sinful nature wants to do evil, which is just the opposite of what the Spirit wants. And the Spirit gives us desires that are the opposite of what the sinful nature desires. These two forces are constantly fighting each other, so you are not free to carry out your good intentions.
New Living Translation (©2007)
The sinful nature wants to do evil, which is just the opposite of what the Spirit wants. And the Spirit gives us desires that are the opposite of what the sinful nature desires. These two forces are constantly fighting each other, so you are not free to carry out your good intentions.
jeudi 26 avril 2012
3/5= 3 rounded off to the nearest whole number and then 6=5 which is wrong so rounding is wrong.
Nils Baeté It isn't really a paradox. If x ϵ [2 , 2.5[ then you round x to 2,
if x ϵ [2.5 , 3[ then you round x to 3.
You can divide the real numbers into intervals of equal length (and wich are all half open except for the interval containing 0 wich is an open interval):
... , ]-2.5 , -1.5] , ]-1.5 , -0.5] , ]-0.5 , 0.5[ , [0.5 , 1.5[ ,
[1.5 , 2.5[ , ...
The median values of the intervals (the value wich lies in the middle of each interval) are: ..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...
The elements of each interval are rounded to the respective median value (so the elements of [1.5 , 2.5[ are rounded to 2 and the elements of [2.5 , 3.5[ are rounded to 3 (like 2.5 wich is rounded to 3)).
You could also divide it like this:
... , [-2.5 , -1.5[ , [-1.5 , -0.5[ , [-0.5 , 0.5] , ]0.5 , 1.5] ,
]1.5 , 2.5] , ...
And in that case you might round 2.5 to 2.
But for the definition of "rounding" they chose the first option. I'm not 100% sure why but maybe it has to do with the fact that R (the collection of the real numbers) itself is an open collection: ]-∞, +∞[
So if you're talking about rounding without any further explaination about it, then you're talking about the first option in wich 2.5 is rounded to 3.
Dark matter does a disappearing act Dark matter has just got even more mysterious. This is the invisible ‘stuff’ which calculations suggest makes up about 83% of the bulk mass of the Universe. Astronomers know it is there even though they cannot see it because by plotting the movement of galaxies and the stars they contain the gravity of the matter we CAN see falls far short. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, for instance, rotates far too rapidly were it to be made only of the visible stars, planets and clouds of dust and gas that we see. Indeed, most galaxies would fall apart were they not glued together with dark matter, whose existence was first postulated in 1932.
Nils Baeté It isn't really a paradox. If x ϵ [2 , 2.5[ then you round x to 2,
if x ϵ [2.5 , 3[ then you round x to 3.
You can divide the real numbers into intervals of equal length (and wich are all half open except for the interval containing 0 wich is an open interval):
... , ]-2.5 , -1.5] , ]-1.5 , -0.5] , ]-0.5 , 0.5[ , [0.5 , 1.5[ ,
[1.5 , 2.5[ , ...
The median values of the intervals (the value wich lies in the middle of each interval) are: ..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...
The elements of each interval are rounded to the respective median value (so the elements of [1.5 , 2.5[ are rounded to 2 and the elements of [2.5 , 3.5[ are rounded to 3 (like 2.5 wich is rounded to 3)).
You could also divide it like this:
... , [-2.5 , -1.5[ , [-1.5 , -0.5[ , [-0.5 , 0.5] , ]0.5 , 1.5] ,
]1.5 , 2.5] , ...
And in that case you might round 2.5 to 2.
But for the definition of "rounding" they chose the first option. I'm not 100% sure why but maybe it has to do with the fact that R (the collection of the real numbers) itself is an open collection: ]-∞, +∞[
So if you're talking about rounding without any further explaination about it, then you're talking about the first option in wich 2.5 is rounded to 3.
« Leave the Internet alone! | Main
20 April 2012 1:44 PM
Dark matter does a disappearing act Dark matter has just got even more mysterious. This is the invisible ‘stuff’ which calculations suggest makes up about 83% of the bulk mass of the Universe. Astronomers know it is there even though they cannot see it because by plotting the movement of galaxies and the stars they contain the gravity of the matter we CAN see falls far short. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, for instance, rotates far too rapidly were it to be made only of the visible stars, planets and clouds of dust and gas that we see. Indeed, most galaxies would fall apart were they not glued together with dark matter, whose existence was first postulated in 1932.
RULE OF THIRDS
Nils Baeté7:33am Apr 26
First of all what do you actually mean with 1, 2, 3 and 4? If it are the NUMBERS 1, 2, 3, 4 then 2+2=4 always. the story about the bouncing ball and energy is just something totally different because a number on itself has no energy.
ok just ot make notation shorter: x = APPLE and y = ORANGE.
x/3 + y/3 + y/3 = x/3 + 2y/3 = (x+2y)/3
If you say (x+2y)/3 = x/y then thats not always true, its a sort of equation that you can try to solve.
First of all what do you actually mean with 1, 2, 3 and 4? If it are the NUMBERS 1, 2, 3, 4 then 2+2=4 always. the story about the bouncing ball and energy is just something totally different because a number on itself has no energy.
ok just ot make notation shorter: x = APPLE and y = ORANGE.
x/3 + y/3 + y/3 = x/3 + 2y/3 = (x+2y)/3
If you say (x+2y)/3 = x/y then thats not always true, its a sort of equation that you can try to solve.
jeudi 19 avril 2012
EINSTEINS THEORY IN THREE DIMENSIONS.
http://physicsessays.org/doi/abs/10.4006/0836-1398-25.1.141
Ed Can you write about transforming this to 10 D space with the clock theory of everything.?
Ed Can you write about transforming this to 10 D space with the clock theory of everything.?
mardi 17 avril 2012
THE TIME MACHINE
Iam going to attempt to build HG wells time machine theoretically.
10 dimensions plus one of time with circular orbits in A Godel universe can be converted to 3 D + 1 of time with eliptical orbits................
You can use 12 dimensions instead of 10 with two of time...............Past and present.
Then you can write equations to convert Einsteins 4D space/time into 10 D plus 2 of time.
Time is reversed in a Godel 10 D universe with circular orbits and it is not relative it is absolute everything that happens in that universe is totally determined by the laws of physics.
So you can write equations for time travel to the past but it is for the whole universe not for a machine where the occupant is somehow in a different space/time dimensions.
But you should be able to apply the equations to reverse time to building a machine that converts 4D Space time into 12 D space time thoerectially anyway it is much simpler than a wormhole may turn out to be the same equation.
But you never come back from LA LA land the land of the crazies when you start working on time travel.
It is for loosers failures jerks and mad professors disfunctional people.
As long as it remains in the land of theory but when you start trying to actually build a time machine you loose it entirely.
10 dimensions plus one of time with circular orbits in A Godel universe can be converted to 3 D + 1 of time with eliptical orbits................
You can use 12 dimensions instead of 10 with two of time...............Past and present.
Then you can write equations to convert Einsteins 4D space/time into 10 D plus 2 of time.
Time is reversed in a Godel 10 D universe with circular orbits and it is not relative it is absolute everything that happens in that universe is totally determined by the laws of physics.
So you can write equations for time travel to the past but it is for the whole universe not for a machine where the occupant is somehow in a different space/time dimensions.
But you should be able to apply the equations to reverse time to building a machine that converts 4D Space time into 12 D space time thoerectially anyway it is much simpler than a wormhole may turn out to be the same equation.
But you never come back from LA LA land the land of the crazies when you start working on time travel.
It is for loosers failures jerks and mad professors disfunctional people.
As long as it remains in the land of theory but when you start trying to actually build a time machine you loose it entirely.
DISPROVING THE BIG CRUNCH
The cyclical theory of the big crunch is like a bouncing ball with each bounce or cycle the universe looses energy and 1+1=2 bounces does not equal 2 so 2+2 bounces does not equal 4.
To make the energy mass equation 2+2=4 balance where 2 is energy and 2 is mass.
You have to make mass increase by the degree that energy is lost to another dimension.............or universe.
By entropy.
If mass increases as you go back in time then the balanced equation must produce infinite mass which is a dealbreaker according to Einstein.
Infinite mass is a paradox in the twin theory which was meant to prove Einstein wrong about relativity.
So infinite mass means the fudge (is like the cosmological constant) it is a cheat and it doesn't work to make the big crunch big bang cycle balance for energy.
The only other way for it to balance is for matter and antimatter to be created by reversing EInsteins equation to create matter from energy..........energy from another dimension or universe dimension ex-nihilo....................
This balances the energy mass equation perfectly and explains the big bang...............
This is a testable theory and you can teach the controversy by comparing this theory to the big crunch evolutionary thoery................
To make the energy mass equation 2+2=4 balance where 2 is energy and 2 is mass.
You have to make mass increase by the degree that energy is lost to another dimension.............or universe.
By entropy.
If mass increases as you go back in time then the balanced equation must produce infinite mass which is a dealbreaker according to Einstein.
Infinite mass is a paradox in the twin theory which was meant to prove Einstein wrong about relativity.
So infinite mass means the fudge (is like the cosmological constant) it is a cheat and it doesn't work to make the big crunch big bang cycle balance for energy.
The only other way for it to balance is for matter and antimatter to be created by reversing EInsteins equation to create matter from energy..........energy from another dimension or universe dimension ex-nihilo....................
This balances the energy mass equation perfectly and explains the big bang...............
This is a testable theory and you can teach the controversy by comparing this theory to the big crunch evolutionary thoery................
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)