#}##pDRAFT#######E###########################################################################################################}##ONE AUTHOR AGAINST EINSTEIN IS ENOUGH WHEN HE IS WRONG ABOUT �
####´#ð#e#´#ð######VIRTUAL PARTICLES.
.####################################################

Einsetin said that only one author was necessary is he was wrong �
about anything in his thoery.
And that is arrogance because even Einstein is only a man and he �
makes mistakes.
.lm  
And he has made one hell of a mistake.Because virtual particles �
in Einsteins thoery have infinite graviational mass because they �
have infinite energy and energy and mass are the same thing.But �
the  the measurement of virtual particles which is not proven �
100% 100% shows that they have zero gravitaional energy so we �
have to renormalise QM and that means Fenyman diagrams for GR.And �
we can't renormalise fenyman diagrams and if we could renormalise  �
Einsteins theory of relativity then we could make QM and GR agree �
on one thing that virtual particles have zero G.And then like �

Hawking used radiation to unify QM and GR we could make a start �
on a new theory of gravity.And nothing is further from the truth �
gravity is not QM it is GR and it cannotbe renormalised to �
zero.If it could approach zero Einstein would be wrong and so �
would QM so it would not do any good to say that G>0 <infinity �
then it is a very large number which means the universe will end �
in a big crunch.Because the total value for Expansions is the �
consological constant plus the gravitaional force of virtual �
particles and the the dark energy which must be greater than the �
dark matter and in fact dark matter must be> dark energy if the �
unv uuniverse will end in a big crunch.........But the universe �
is aaaccelerating and that means G is not great enough to slow �
the expansion so g for virtual particles must not be a very large �
number and it can be very large and still not slow the �
expansion.But if it infinite then it will stop the expansion �
totally rigth now and it does not..So maybe they are wrong that �
the universe is accelerating then G could be a very large value �
if there is a lot of dark matter and not so much dark energy and �
therethere is a lot of G from virtual particles

.And this does not �
prove Einstein wrong but means his theory needs a little tweaking �
like making it right for a Godel universe in 10 large spacial �
diemddimensions a godel can contract but cannot expand and it is �
just right for a big crunch because the orbits are circular and �
atoms cannot exist without the electrons spiralling into the �
nucleus and this is annihilation because the natural repulsion �
between electrons is overcome by strong gravity and the mass of �
the supereclectron is equal to the proton so when they are in the �
same space at the same time in the same state then they anni#�
hilate producing gamma rays and nuetrons which then form a new �
kind of singularity which results in a big bang.........Einstein �
cannot be expressed in ten large spacial dimensions only in 4D �
space time you cannot convert EInsteins equations to 10 D.And if �
not then you cannot prove string theory to be correct.Because �
string theory is in only six dimensions that are curled up and �
four that are large spacial no one except me has ever suggested �
that string theory could be in ten large spacial dimensions.But i �
think that they could have been open and as the universe con#�
tracted six of those dimensions curled up.And it doesn't make # 
ð
would not exist as it requires a dimension of time to exist that �
means there had to be three dimenions of space.......The universe �
requires it that is why it had to be that way............But this �
is paln B and does not prove EInstein wrong even if string thoery �
does not agree with his theory in ten dimesnions.Since it is an �
imag imaginary universe a Godel where time can be reversed.And �
everything is determined this kind of universe cannot predict the �
initial starting conditions of our universe and the equations for �
Einsteins theory that result from it.............

Einstein is a very smart man but even the most clever men make �
mistakes.And that is the arguement we shall use about virtsual �
particles.They do not really exist and that is a very positive �
thing because they are confusing and if we simplify and say there �
are no virtual particles then they have zero gravity.And that �
solves the problem the universe will go on forever.And will never �
stop expanding until it is a  total vacume and the idea that it �
will ever become another big bang is totally stupid the unverse �
will not forget it's size and become tiny again this is just a �
fudge to make it work when it doesn't.Maybe the universe will �
contract because dark matter> dark energy.And this is again a �
very positive point of view because there is more than enough �
energy in virtual particles to end the universe we don't need �
dark matter to explain contraction................And if it is �
there then why is the universe expanding faster and �
faster............It must be because dark energy> dark matter.And �
this is the kind of equation I used in the first book. Energy is �
greatet than matter and if dark energy is greater than dark �
matter when it comes to G the universe will expand �
forever........And that does not include virtual particles they �
can only make a good thing bad.Because they can cause the uni#�
verse to contract even if dark matter> dark energy.
And of course dark matter will be greater than virtual particles.

But if niether dark matter nor dark energy exist then virtual �
particles>0 and less than infinity they are very> a very large G �
number and that was my first hypothesis that Gravity is greater �
than the expansion............Even if our present unverse does �
not crunch it may have begun with a big crunch in a different �
kind of universe with different laws where a crunch can happen.
And if the intial conditions are all predetermined by the big �
crunch then the idea that we do not know what happened before is �
not true.And time may begin again a second time with the big �
bang.But we can still predict teh inital starting conditions.
And this is crazy to believe time can start again.But it can stop �
and the watch can start again from where it left off.That means �
we can know when time stopped and when it started again.


My string theory of everything is that black holes in another �
universe resulted in our universe.............And the other �
universe is one that contracts and it is a Godel and a Godel �
can't expand but can contract and rotate as well............A �
rotating black holein a godel universe is contradictory in time # 
ð
Hawkings reverse penrose equation we get a big bang in our uni#�
verse in four space/time dimensions.........But the Godel is in �
ten large spacial dimensions.And there is a reason six of those �
curled up when the universe contracted and formed a huge signu#�
larity which became our universe.But then we have two we do#�
n'thave one and we don't have a multiverse except backwards in �
the time dimension then there are infinite universes back in time �
which all may have different laws but not somewhere out there.If �
it makes sense to say out there where there is nothing there �
beyond our universe except in some other dimension.
And this thoery does make no sense execpet if you can get the �
equations for planet earth from 10^500 different rules that are �
random in other universes.
There could still be 10^500 different rules as we go back through �
the different universes from square one.
And there would be no square one.
But there must have been a begining even if there was a multive#�
rse back in time............Because 2+2=4.. And that is crazy how �
does that prove anything.
Put simply 2+2=4 does not balance for a bouncing ball energy is �
lost and does not balance with momentum which is Einsteins second �
equation.
E does not equal MC^2 for 2+2=4 big bounces..........and to make �
it work we need THE FUDGE the fudge is mass increases as the �
speed of light goes faster so energy balances with mass over �
2+2=4 bounces.
And this is totally rigthous.
Because the equation for the universe balances just like the �
cosmlogical constant.
Only mass must reach infinity with time going on �
forever...........
And maybe mass just appraoches infinity and time still goes on �
forever with mass reaching 99.99999 of the speed of light whatev#�
er that is back in time..............
If mass never reaches one then the problem is solved the universe �
can goon forever.
But if mass does have to reach infinity if time never ends then �
infinite mass is a dealbreaker for Einsetin.
And we can get rid of the infinities in Einsteins equations by �
tweaking it with virtual particles having large but not infinite �
energy.That is where the mistake is in EInsteins theory.
It has to be with infinity.
If we can make everything finite because of virtual particles �
then we have a quantum/Einsten thoery of gravity which is a �
little like a thoery of everythhing.
But we have three others forces which are already unified so to �
slove the problem is to unifiy everything.
And Iam not a mathematician and leave it to the maths profesors �
to work out whether my simplifiction makes sense mathematically.
But Einsteins did not notice the universe was expanding or that �
his equations allowed time travel.
And it is the same with virtual particles they are the answer to �
everything.
And if the universe can contract then it did in the past then we # 
ð
universe for the right set of Einsteins equations.The initial �
starying conditions for the universe can give you the set of �
Einsteins equations that will work for our universe.If the inti#�
tal starting conditions are wrong then our univers eis not predi#�
catble.And it is super the gravity and it is not that super that �
it can predict everything.And reversing the directionof time is �
not like unscambling an omelette and the order increases s it is �
eactly liek that so the order was created by evolution and that �
is how God did it.Because he is God he can do it anyway he wants �
to and he can't he has to obey the bible which was written by His �
holy spirit so it is not one book and it is totally one and seven �
as well.And maybe this thoery is 666 because it is what they �
beleive no instead of lamaires thoery.........And the catholic �
church still believes in the big bang.But no one else does be#�
cause they have listened to half a man the other half of captain �
kirk.And they are half men when they believe in the big crunch �
and they might be whole men who are halfhearted.Because if you �
believe in evolution the big crunch is right for you.If you �
believe it happened in another universe at a different time.And �
that just begs the question you have to have another universe �
where the big crunch works because it does not work in ours �
according to measurement and measurement is what science is all �
about.
We can propose a unified theory of everything based on  a uni#�
verse that may not exist and it will still work and it will be �
eovlutionary since the challenge is to make up a creation science �
theory of everything that can be taught alongside.And it cannot �
be done.Because there is no equation for God he is just a first  �
ccause in the big bang.But an exnihilo thoery of everything would �
make the word the source of all information and that is a begin#�
ing somebody else will finish the idea.And it doesn't matter and �
of course it does it matters not to loose the good we oft might �
win by fearing to attempt...........But I have made up a  thoery �
ofevolution because I was an evolutionist and now i know why my �
thoery is wrong because like Einstein I have proved my own thoery �
wrong with infinity..........You cannot have infinite �
mass.........or light cannot travel faster than C if it could �
then mass could be infinite.But it cannot ever be as large as �
infinity.So the only alternative is for mass to approach infinity �
and never quite equal then 2+2 does not equal four and that is �
proof that evolution is wrong.But you can ever understand that �
proof and you only need to look at a bouncing ball.If it will not �
work inour universe it may never work in any other.Because 2+2 �
will not equal four in any big crunch universe.And that is taking �
the glory back from satan he would say 2+2=4 is his thing but it �
really is a totally natural thing and it can subverted to be �
suprnature.And just because it is true doesn't mean that the �
devil can't use it.And just because it is not true that is this �
thoery doesn't mean that the devil can't use it.And that is what �
Marg said because she is a woman of God.Marg Weiland was inter#�
ested in the four laws but there is not time to discuss them �
here.
They are a great way to spread the gospel and thier is no subsi#�
tutute for the gospel and it is found in the book of romans we # 
ð
Ghost who we can recieve by faith.It begins and ends with �
faith.If it begins with works righeousness it will end with filty �
rags but if it begins with faith in the gospel it will end with �
faith in the gospel.
There must be a  universe where diracs 1938 electron proton �
annihilation equation works one rule out of 10^500 random rules.
You can add random equations with the dice for diracs equation �
and get a rule where it works in a 10 large spacial dimension �
universe with supergravity that overcomes the repulsion between �
electrons so that the mass of the proton equals the mass of the �
electron then they can annihilate.
It is this rule that is the key to the theory of everything.
This is a perfect theory that we can get the intial starting �
conditions and work out EInsteins equations for everything for �
our universe.But what if they don't work then it is back to the �
drawking board we can tweak the universe that preceeded ours to �
get the right equations but that is a cheat and that is far from �
elegant.But just like particle theory we can make it work by �
making it fit the obseverations and that is bad science you make �
the thoery fit the observations is good science but the thoery is �
meant to predict the observations not be modified to make it �
fit.And that is the whole idea of science we need to make the �
theory fit the onservations so we could argue forever.......But �
we can take what we can get and that is a great science thoery if �
we can'[t get a thoery of everything then we can get a thoery of �
ssomething or of nothing......or of something out of �
nothing...........And we may never understand how something came �
form nothing.But we need a bomb and we don't so maybe we should �
not ask for infinite energy maybe man can't handle that kind of �
power.And if he can then God knows how to make it safe for �
him...........Because if you ask God for a solution to the energy �
crisis then he does not give a scorpian he gives a loaf of bread.

Classical mechanics will work in a big crunch universe.But it is �
statement true or is it a lie.Heizenberg will work even in a big �
crunch universe where is no uncertainty and my arguement is that �
will not work where there certainty about the future.And since �
the future is the past reversed there are no questions that �
cannot be answered about a big crunch universe.But can we go from �
certainty to uncertainty if no is certainty then we cannot go �
from a no to a yes. And we can know the initial starting condi#�
tions which can give us the version of Einsteins equations that �
are right for the big bang in our universe.But what if the equa#�
tions ar enot right for our universe then it is Gods plan B.It �
can apply in 10^500 other universes but ours is special it was �
intelligently designed God intervened.And if he did intervene �
than no explaination without God will even satisfy the intial �
starting conditions.
Classical mechanics can explain why electrons spiral into atoms �
and why planets spiral into stars or off into space.
In ten dimensions large spacial dimensions classical mechanics �
works because there is no need for heizenberg in a contracting �
universe..........And this is so bright not one can deny it but �
they can say this universe is imaginary and even if the math is # 
ð
So we can create a classical theory of everything one that com#�
plements the standard model now that it is complete.What then �
when we have completed both models then we have to get both �
models to agree with string thoery and I have a handle on that �
too.
So that is the next step explain it all with �
strings...............In ten large spacial dimensions where we �
start with six extra open dimensions that curl up and leave four �
dimensions for the big bang....This is a perfect plan B for �
evolution but may not explain our universe and its fine tuning �
only ex-nihilo can explain how God is part of the process.And we �
can't leave him out of the equation or we get a babbler of a �
computer wih garbage being programmed in and garbage coming out